Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Hegel´s social and political thought has been often been interpreted as a defense of authoritarian statism against modern individualism. In this paper I claim, on the contrary, that the value and dignity of the individual is the conclusion of Hegel´s philosophical anthropology and, thus, the principle and foundation of his entire political philosophy. The value and dignity of the individual rely, more precisely, on her freedom of self-determination. The different forms of personal interaction that Hegel develops in his philosophy of Right are thus those that offer the condition of possibility for the exercise of the freedom of self-determination of each individual. Freedom as the capacity to determine oneself does not imply, however, that the goal of human action should be that each individual does whatever she wants. Common good is not the necessary result of the sum of all the actions of the individuals in order to obtain their private well-being; precisely because that is not the case, the common good must be a goal in itself and there must exist a specific organization that takes it as its own goal, namely the State. Indeed, the whole meaning of the State is for Hegel to guarantee that all individuals in society become effectively autonomous agents and can exert their capacity of self-determination.
References
Adorno, T. W. (1986) (GS 10) Stichworte. En, R. Tiedemann (Ed.), Adorno. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 10 (pp. 595–798). Suhrkamp.
Cassirer, E. (1946). The Myth of the State. Yale University Press.
Feuerbach, L. (2006). Das Wesen des Christentums. En, W. Schuffenhauer y W. Harich (Eds.). Feuerbach. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 5 (pp. 1–454). Akademie Verlag.
Goodfield, E. (2017). Negating Negation. A Century of Revision in the Reception of Hegel´s Political Philosophy. History of Political Thought, 38(2), 295–322.
Grattan-Guinness, I. (1992). Russell and Karl Popper: Their Personal Contacts. Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 12(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v12i1.1815
Haym, R. (1857). Hegel und seine Zeit. Gaertner.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a) (TWA 7). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. En, E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.). Hegel. Werke in 20 Bänden, vol. 7 (pp. 11–512). Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b) (TWA 12). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte. En, E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.). Hegel. Werke in 20 Bänden, vol. 12 (pp. 11–540). Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970c) (TWA 16). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion I. En, E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.). Hegel. Werke in 20 Bänden, vol. 16 (pp. 11–442). Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992) (GW 20). Enzyklopadie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). En, W. Bonsiepen y H.-Ch. Lucas (Eds.). Hegel. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 20. Meiner.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2009) (GW 14.1). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. En, K. Grotsch y E. Weisser-Lohmann. Hegel. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 14.1. Meiner.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2011) (GW 25.2). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des subjektiven Geistes. Nachschrift zu dem Kolleg des Wintersemesters 1827/28 und sekundäre Überlieferung. En, Ch. J. Bauer (Ed.). Hegel. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 25.2. Meiner.
Hobhouse, L. T. (1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State. George Allen & Unwin.
Hook, S. (1936). From Hegel to Marx: Studies in the Intellectual Developmentof Karl Marx. Reynal & Hitchcock.
Hook, S. (1965). Hegel Rehabilitated? Encounter, 24(1), 53–58.
Hu?rstel, S. (2010). Au nom de Hegel. Les juristes ne?o-he?ge?liens et la philosophie du droit de la Re?publique de Weimar au Troisie?me Reich. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Internationaler Militärgerichtshof Nürnberg (Ed.) (1994). Der Nürnberger Prozess gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher vom 14. November 1945 bis 01. Oktober 1946. Vol. 5. Delphin.
Jouanjan, O. (1997). Les fossoyeurs de Hegel. Rénovation allemande du droit et néo-hégélianisme sous le IIIe Reich. Droits: Revue française de théorie juridique, 25, 121–133.
Jouanjan, O. (2002). Communauté, race et rénovation allemande du droit. Karl Larenz, ou les errements de l’hégélianisme juridique sous le Troisième Reich. En, C. Colliot-Thélène y J.-F. Kervégan (Eds.). De la société à la sociologie (pp. 183–221). ENS Éditions.
Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Meiner.
Kiesewetter, H. (1974). Von Hegel zu Hitler. Eine Analyse der Hegelschen Machtstaatsideologie und der politischen Wirkungsgeschichte des Rechtshegelianismus. Hoffmann und Campe.
Kiesewetter, H. (1995). Von Hegel zu Hitler. Die Verwirklichung einer totalitären Machtstaatstheorie in Deutschland (1815–1945). 2. völlig veränderte und erweiterte Auflage. Lang.
Luther, T. (2009). Hegels Critique of Modernity: Reconciling Individual Freedom and the Community. Lexington Books.
Maritain, J. (1936). Humanisme intégral. Aubier.
Maritain, J. (1951). Man and the State. The University of Chicago Press.
Marx, K. (1981) (MEW 1). Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. En, Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED (Ed.), Marx & Engels. Werke, vol. 1 (pp. 202–333). Dietz.
Neuhouser, F. (2000). Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Yale University Press.
Nicolin, G. (Ed.) (1970). Hegel in Berichten seiner Zeitgenossen. Meiner.
Nietzsche, F. (1988) (KSA 5). Jenseits von Gut und Böse. En, G. Colli y M. Montinari (Eds.). Nietzsche. Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 5 (pp. 9–243). dtv/de Gruyter.
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies, vol. II: The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath. Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1994). Alles Leben ist Problemlösen. Über Erkenntnis, Geschichte und Politik. Piper.
Sabine, G. H. (1932). Hegel’s Political Philosophy. The Philosophical Review, 41(3), 261–282.
Sabine, G. H. (1937). A History of Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Stewart, J. (2018). Hegel’s Interpretation of the Religions of the World: The Logic of the Gods. Oxford University Press.
Tallentyre, S. G. (1906). The Friends of Voltaire. Smith, Elther & co.
Winfield, R. D. (1991). Freedom and Modernity. State University of New York Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Héctor Ferreiro