Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
O conceito de presentismo tem estado no centro das discussões atuais da disciplina histórica. Entre os esforços para definir o presentismo, nos deparamos com abordagens radicalmente diferentes. Por um lado, temos estudiosos que o veem como “um pecado capital” ou como um vício, enquanto, por outro lado, há muitos que reconhecem nele algo inevitável e que deve ser compreendido e bem recebido. Neste artigo, exploramos e discutimos essas posições contrastantes e defendemos três virtudes centrais que o presentismo pode trazer para nossa compreensão do passado. Por meio da análise de narrativas que envolvem a Segunda Guerra Mundial e a fundação dos Estados Unidos, argumentamos que o presentismo: 1. permite que a história seja crítica ao motivar revisões do presente em relação a relatos estabelecidos - principalmente centrados no Ocidente; 2. permite que criemos novas perspectivas sobre o passado ao usar estrategicamente as ferramentas do nosso presente e, por fim, 3. acolhe o pluralismo em vez de uma única verdade histórica. Esses pontos nos permitem defender uma visão do passado que não seja estática, fixa e fechada para sempre, mas que, em vez disso, o veja como um lugar de debate, disputa e renovação constante.
Referências
Armitage, D. (2023). In Defense of Presentism. In D. M. McMahon, (Ed.). History and Human Flourishing (pp. 59-84). Oxford University Press.
Assmann, A. (2020). Is Time out of Joint: On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime. Cornell University Press.
Assmann, A. (2019). Conclusion: A Creed that has lost its Believers? Reconfiguring the Concepts of Time and History. In M. Tamm, O. Laurent, (eds.). Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism (pp.207-218). Bloomsbury.
Adichie, C. (2016, 02 of august). The danger of a single origin story. Facing History & Ourselves. https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/danger-single-story.
Banner, J. (2021). The Ever-Changing Past: Why All History Is Revisionist History. Yale University Press.
Bosworth, R. J. B. (1993). Explaining Auschwitz and Hiroshima: History Writing and the Second World War 1945–1990. Routledge.
Bosworth, R. J. B (1996). Nations Examine Their Past: A Comparative Analysis of the Historiography of the ‘Long’ Second World War. The History Teacher, 29(4), 499-523, https://doi.org/10.2307/494801.
Buchanan, A. (2019). World War II in Global Perspective, 1931–1953: A Short History. Wiley Blackwell.
Buchanan, A. (2023). Globalizing the Second World War. Past and Present, 258(1), 246–281, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtab042.
Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian Pasts? University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828654-004.
Colla, M. (2021). The Spectre of the Present: Time, Presentism and the Writing of Contemporary History. Contemporary European History, 30(1), 124-135, https://doi.org/10.1017/S096077732000048X .
Conrad, S. (2018). Nothing is the way it should be: Global transformations of the time regime in the nineteenth century. Modern Intellectual History, 15(3), 821-848, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244316000391 .
Coombs D. S., & Coriale, D. (2016). Introduction. Victorian Studies, 59(1), 87-89, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1060150399272014.
Doran, R., & White, H. (2010). Humanism, Formalism, and the Discourse of History. In R. Doran, (ed.). The Fiction of Narrative. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fuchs, E., & Kasahara, T., & Saaler S. (2018). A New Modern History of East Asia. Unipress GmbH.
Gordon-Reed, A. (2021). On Juneteenth. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Hämäläinen, P. (2022). Indigenous Continent. Liveright Publishing-W.
Hannah-Jones P. (2021). The 1619 Project. One World.
Hon Tze-ki. (2021). From Trust to Mistrust: Sino-Japanese Relations after the Versailles. In M. Tosh, D. Evan, (eds.). Beyond Versailles: The 1919 Moment and a New Order in East Asia. Lexington Books.
Hunt, L. (2022). Against Presentism. Publishing History, 40(5).
Kleinberg, E. (2023). Hiding (from the Present) in the Past. History of the Present, 13(2), 265–274, https://doi.org/10.1215/21599785-10630160.
Koshiro, Y. (2013). Imperial Eclipse: Japan’s Strategic Thinking about Continental Asia before 1945. Cornell University Press.
Meretoja H. (2018). The Ethics of Storytelling. Oxford University Press.
Mitter, R. (2017). Presentism and China’s changing Wartime Past. Past and Present, 234(1), 263-274.
Morgan, J. (2022, 26 of august). History Is History. American Conservative. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/history-is-history/.
Rubin, M. (2017). Presentism’s useful anachronisms. Past and Present, (234), 236–244, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtw057.
Satia, P. (2022). The Presentist Trap. Perspectives on History, 60(7).
Sclafani, E. (2022, 09 of february). The danger of a single origin story. AHA: Perspectives on History. https://lc.cx/wrm86L
Sessa, K. (2022). Presentism and the Study of Late Antiquity: Friend or Foe? Studies in Late Antiquity, 6(4), 571-574, https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2022.6.4.571.
Scott, J. (2022, 24 of august). History Is Always about Politics. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/history-is-always-about-politics.
Sweet, H. J. (2022). Is History? Perspectives on History, 60(6).
Trautmann, R. T. (2009). Indian Time, European Time. In R. Trautmann, (ed.). The Clash of Chronologies: Ancient India in the Modern World. Yoda Press.
Walsham, A. (2017). Introduction: Past and… Presentism. Past and Present, 234(1), 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtw054
White, H. (1966). The Burden of History. History and Theory, 5(2), 111-134.
White, H. (2022). The Ethics of Narrative. Cornell University Press .
Young, L (2023). Past and Present in Japanese Historiography: Four Versions of Presentism. Modern Intellectual History, (20)2, 612-629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000221
Este trabalho está licensiado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Theodor Pelekanidis, Mariana Imaz