A normative view of madness from Kantian philosophy to understand anti-vaccine and anti-mask protests of 2020 and 2021
PDF
EPUB

Keywords

Loucura; razão; epistemologia; transcendental; normatividade; protestos da COVID. Locura; razón; epistemología; trascendental; normatividad; COVID protestas. Madness; reason; epistemology; transcendental; normativity; COVID proteste.

How to Cite

Mayorga Alberto, J. S. (2022). A normative view of madness from Kantian philosophy to understand anti-vaccine and anti-mask protests of 2020 and 2021. Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 3(6), e210100. https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100

Abstract

This text aims to offer a epistemic-normative reading of madness in Kant's work and its different developments throughout his work. This to maintain that madness arises from rationality itself when understood it as a force that exceeds the limits that reason imposes on itself. By outlining normality or mental sanity as the restriction of reason to sensibility, Kant intends -I maintain- to outline the minimum subjective and epistemic conditions for a republican political conformation, which is based on the agreement between subjects about the rules that will regulate their actions and interactions. This reading will allow us to outline an understanding of the anti-vaccine protest that took place during the pandemic. Showing that those who promote and follow them break with this minimum agreement on the restrictions of reason, thus reaching selfish excesses that harm democratic dynamics. I concluded that these people can be understood as madness people who represent a danger to the republican and democratic political organization.

https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v3i6.100
PDF
EPUB

References

Béjar, A. (ed). (2005). Immanuel Kant Ensayo sobre las enfermedades de la cabeza. Machado Libros.

Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant´s Anthropology. Semiotext(e).

Guyer, P., & Wood, A. (eds). (1992). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant in translation: Theoretical Philosophy (1755-1770). Cambridge University Press.

Guyer, P. & Wood, A. (eds). (1998). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant in translation: Critique of pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.

Guyer, P. (ed). (2000). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant in translation: Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge University Press. England.

Hatfield, G. (1991). The natural and the normative. MIT Press.

Kitcher, P. (1995). Revisting Kant´s Epistemology, Apriority and psychologism. Nous, 29(3), 285-315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215601

Rodriguez, J., & Piedrahita, P. (2022). Discurso populista y negacionista de la violencia de género y la diversidad sexual en la pos-pandemia. Visual Review, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.37467

Rodríguez J., Calvo de Castro, P., y Sánchez Diez, I. E. (2021). Políticas de incomunicación ante la COVID-19 en España: Estrategias de manipulación para la culpabilización de las manifestaciones del 8M. Historia y Comunicación Social, 26 (Especial), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.74239

Teruel, R. (2021). Naturaleza, conflicto y locura en Kant: el concepto de sin razón positiva. Con-textos Kantianos.

Waxman, W. (2014) Kant´s anatomy of the intelligent Mind. Oxford

Waxman, W. (2019) A guide to kant´s Psychologism. Routledge.

Zöller, G., & Louden, R. (eds). (2007). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant in translation: Antrophology, history and education. Cambridge University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Johan Sebastián Mayorga Alberto

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...