Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Law
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Inteligencia artificial; cambio social; tecnología; delito informático; digitalización; derecho. Artificial intelligence; social change; technology; computer crime; digitization; law. Inteligência artificial; mudança social; tecnologia; crime de computador; digitalização; lei.

How to Cite

Ávila Zea, M. P., & Zamora Vázquez, A. F. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Law. Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 5(9), e240142. https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v5i9.142

Abstract

The integration of technology in the field of criminal law poses significant challenges due to the lack of regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), which could compromise fundamental rights. This study focuses on addressing these challenges and proposing solutions through a comprehensive analysis of the current situation and potential implications of AI in the criminal legal system. The main objective of this research is to analyze the problems, challenges and opportunities that arise with the implementation of artificial intelligence in the criminal field. It seeks to identify the need for a specific regulation for AI in criminal law, to protect the fundamental rights of individuals and ensure a fair and equitable legal system. To address this issue, a qualitative methodological approach was adopted. A detailed literature review was carried out to examine the background, problems and challenges associated with AI in legal systems, especially in the criminal field. In addition, analyses of criteria and opinions of legal experts were conducted to obtain a deeper understanding of the situation and possible solutions. The results of this study reveal the urgent need to establish specific regulations to govern the application of artificial intelligence in the criminal field. It is highlighted that the lack of regulation represents a significant risk to fundamental rights, especially regarding the configuration of crimes with the support of AI. In addition, different dimensions that need to be addressed in regulation are identified, including basic principles and rules of law, human oversight of AI systems, and the promotion of responsible innovation in this field. This article highlights the importance of establishing effective regulation for artificial intelligence in the criminal sphere. Such regulation will not only protect the fundamental rights of individuals, but also promote responsible and progressive use of AI as a valuable tool for legal professionals. It is crucial that the regulation be comprehensive and adaptive to ensure a fair and equitable legal system in the digital age.

https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v5i9.142
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Araya Paz, Carlos. (2020). Desafíos legales de la inteligencia artificial en Chile. Revista chilena de derecho y tecnología, 9(2), 257-290. https://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2020.54489

Ayala, C.L. (2019, 21 de diciembre). El big data del Gobierno: Los detalles del informe por el estallido social que entregó a la Fiscalía. LT La tercera. https://acortar.link/2D5mqg

Banco Pichincha. (2021, 14 de diciembre). El fraude del CEO, una estafa que pone en jaque a tu negocio. https://www.pichincha.com/blog/que-es-fraude-del-ceo

Calo, R. (2017, 19 de octubre). Política de inteligencia artificial: introducción y hoja de ruta. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350

Canó, R.J. (2018, 20 de marzo). Primer atropello mortal de un coche sin conductor. El Pais. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2018/03/19/actualidad/1521479089_032894.html

Castro Castro, R. J., Chiquito Muñiz, J. J., Romero Castro, M. I., & Clavel Quintero, Y. (2022). La inteligencia artificial y sus diferencias con los sistemas expertos. Journal TechInnovation, 1(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.47230/Journal.TechInnovation.v1.n2.2022.88-96

Comisión Europea. (2020, 19 de febrero). LIBRO BLANCO sobre la inteligencia artificial–un enfoque europeo orientado a la excelencia y la confianza. https://acortar.link/dYC6mW

Comisión Europea. (2018, 25 de abril). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A237%3AFIN

Díaz Montero, F. (2020, 15 de enero). “No hemos encontrado ningún valor”: Fiscal Abbott desecha informe Big Data entregado por La Moneda. Biobiochile. https://acortar.link/HRQACM

Elizalde Salazar, I. (2020). Capítulo 1. Vehículos autónomos. Desplazamiento de las reglas de responsabilidad civil del propietario al fabricante. Críticas a la propuesta. El riesgo de la circulación seguirá exitiendo. En L. Arismendy Mengual, F. Oyarzún Vargas; M.J. Santos Morón, J.R. Mercader Uguina, y P. del Olmo García (coord.). Nuevos retos del Derecho de Daños en Iberoamérica (pp. 841-858). Tirant lo Blanch.

European Parliament. (2020, 21 de abril). Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament on ethical principles for the development, deployment. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0186_EN.html

Farfán Intriago, J.L. (2023). Inteligencia artificial y Derecho: ¿La justicia en manos de la IA? Frónesis, 8-13.

Frosini, V. (2019). Cibernética, derecho, internet y sociedad. Olejnik.

Martínez Espín, P. (2023). La propuesta de marco regulador de los sistemas de Inteligencia Artificial en el mercado de la UE. Revista CESCO De Derecho De Consumo, (46), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18239/RCDC_2023.46.3322

Miró Llinares, F. (2020). INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL Y JUSTICIA PENAL: MÁS ALLÁ DE LOS RESULTADOS LESIVOS CAUSADOS POR ROBOTS. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, (20), 87–130. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.20.2018.26446

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2020, 7 de Septiembre). UNESDOC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373434_spa

Parlamento Europeo. (2017, 16 de febrero). Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, con recomendaciones destinadas a la Comisión sobre normas de Derecho civil sobre robótica (2015/2103(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_ES.html

Parra Sepúlveda, D., & Concha Machuca, R. (2021). Inteligencia artificial y derecho. Problemas, desafíos y oportunidades. Vniversitas, 70, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj70.iadp

Pons Gamon, V. (2017). Internet, la nueva era del delito: ciberdelito, ciberterrorismo, legislación y ciberseguridad/ Internet, the new age of crime: cibercrime, ciberterrorism, legislation and cibersecurity. URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios De Seguridad, (20), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.20.2017.2563

Porcelli, A. M. (2020). La Inteligencia Artificial y la Robótica: sus dilemas sociales, éticos y jurídicos. Derecho Global. Estudios Sobre Derecho Y Justicia, 6(16), 49–105. https://doi.org/10.32870/dgedj.v6i16.286

PortalTIC. (2018, 22 de mayo). Europa Press PortalTIC. https://acortar.link/H8wkjf

Solar Cayón, J.I. (2020). La inteligencia artificial jurídica: nuevas herramientas y perspectivas metodológicas para el jurista. Revus, 41. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.6547

Velazquez Palmero, C. (2023). La responsabilidad de los vehículos autónomos. EasyLaw. https://easylawmagazine.com/2023/07/27/la-responsabilidad-de-los-vehiculos-autonomos/

Verheij, B. (2020). Artifcial intelligence as law. Artif Intell Law, 28, 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09266-0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 María Paula Ávila Zea, Ana Fabiola Zamora Vázquez

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...