Palabras clave
Cómo citar
Resumen
Uno de los principales problemas de la filosofía de la psicopatología contemporánea consiste en definir qué tipo de estados mentales son aquellos que denominamos delirantes. A esto se le ha denominado el “problema tipológico de los delirios”. El principal objetivo de este artículo es examinar las principales alternativas filosóficas contemporáneas a este problema: el doxasticismo—de acuerdo con el cuál los delirios deben ser caracterizados como creencias—y al anti-doxasticismo—el cuál niega el estatuto doxásticos de los delirios y ofrece una caracterización alternativa. Para examinar el debate, el artículo presentará las principales características de ambas posiciones y sus fundamentos. Después, examinaremos los principales argumentos esgrimidos contra el doxasticismo y las respuestas y contraargumentos por parte de las alternativas doxásticas. Finalmente, expondremos algunas cuestiones conceptuales y desafíos abiertos relacionados con el debate y que, a nuestro juicio, deberían de marcar la hoja de ruta de los filósofos de la mente interesados en los delirios en los próximos años.Citas
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5-TR®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Bayne, T. (2010). Delusions as doxastic states: Contexts, compartments, and commitments. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(4), 329-336.
Bayne, T., & Pacherie, E. (2004a). Bottom-Up or Top-Down? Campbell's Rationalist Account of Monothematic Delusions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2004.0033
Bayne, T., & Pacherie, E. (2004b). Experience, belief, and the interpretive fold. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(1), 81-86.
Bayne, T., & Pacherie, E. (2005). In defence of the doxastic conception of delusions. Mind & Language, 20(2), 163-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00281.x
Berrios, G. E. (1991). Delusions as "wrong beliefs": A conceptual history. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 159(14), 6–13.
Bortolotti, L. (2010). Delusions and other irrational beliefs. Oxford University Press.
Bortolotti, L. (2011). Double Bookkeeping in Delusions: Explaining the Gap between Saying and Doing. In J. H. Aguilar, A. A. Buckareff, & K. Frankish (Eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304253_12
Bortolotti, L. (2012). In Defence of Modest Doxasticism About Delusions. Neuroethics, 5(1), 39– 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9122-8
Bortolotti, L. (2018). Delusions in context. Springer Nature.
Bortolotti, L., & Miyazono, K. (2015). Recent work on the nature and development of delusions. Philosophy Compass, 10(9), 636-645.
Clutton, P. (2018). A new defence of doxasticism about delusions: The cognitive phenomenological defence. Mind & Language, 33(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12164
Coltheart, M. (2007). Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 60(8), 1041–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701338071
Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & McKay, R. (2011). Delusional belief. Annual review of psychol- ogy, 62, 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131622
Connors, M. H. & Halligan, P. W. (2020). Delusions and theories of belief. Conscious Cogn. 81.
Corlett, P. R., Horga, G., Fletcher, P. C., Alderson-Day, B., Schmack, K., & Powers III, A. R. (2019). Hallucinations and strong priors. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23(2), 114–127.
Currie, G. (2000). Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. Mind & Language, 15(1), 168– 183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00128
Currie, G., & Jureidini, J. (2001). Delusion, Rationality, Empathy: Commentary on Martin Da- vies et al.: Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 8(2), 159-162. doi:10.1353/ppp.2001.0006
Currie, G., & Ravenscroft, I. (2002). Recreative minds: Imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. MIT Press.
Egan, A. (2008). Imagination, delusion, and self-deception. In T. Bayne & J. Fernandez (Eds.), Delusion and Self-Deception: Affective and Motivational Influences on Belief For- mation (Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science) (pp. 263-280). Psychology Press.
Frankish, K. (2009). Delusion: a two-level framework. In M. Broome, & L. Bortolotti (Eds.), Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 269– 280). Oxford University Press.
Frankish, K. (2012). Delusions, levels of belief, and non-doxastic acceptances. Neuroethics, 5(1), 23-27.
Gallagher, S. (2009). Delusional Realities. En M. R. Broome & L. Bortolotti (Eds), Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Gerrans. (2014). The measure of madness. MIT Press.
Graham, G. (2010). Are the deluded believers? Are philosophers among the deluded? Philos- ophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(4), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2010.0033
Green, H., Hauser, L., & Troyakov, V. (2018). Are delusions beliefs? A qualitative examination of the doxastic features of delusions. Psychosis, 10(4), 319-328, DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1528298
Hamilton, A. (2006). Against the belief model of delusion. In M.C.Chung, K. W. M. Fulford, & G. Graham (Eds.), Reconceiving schizophrenia (pp. 217-234). Oxford University Press.
Hohwy, J., & Rajan, V. (2012). Delusions as forensically disturbing perceptual inferences. Neuroethics, 5(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9124-6
Jaspers, K. (1963). General Psychopathology. Manchester University Press.
Kusters, W. (2020). A Philosophy of Madness: The Experience of Psychotic Thinking. MIT Press.
López-Silva, P. (2016). The typology problem and the doxastic approach to delusions. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 17(2), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.172.15
López-Silva, P. (2021). La marca de la psicosis: hacia una síntesis del problema tipológico de los delirios. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034745021001724
López-Silva, P. & Cavieres, A. (2021). La Realidad Transformada: Hacia una Recalibración de la Psicopatología Contemporánea. SONEPSYN.
López-Silva, P. & Cavieres, A. (2022). El delirio psicótico como objeto de estudio multidisciplinar para la filosofía de la mente. Sophia, 33, 71-90.
Miyazono, K. (2019). Delusions and beliefs: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge.
Miyazono, K., & Bortolotti, L. (2014). The causal role argument against doxasticism about delusions. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (3), 30-50.
Mölder, B. (2010). Mind ascribed: An elaboration and defence of interpretivism. John Benjamins Publishing.
Murray, R., & Quattrone, D. (2021). The Kraepelian concept of schizophrenia: Dying but not yet dead. Schizophrenia Research, 242, 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.12.005
Murphy, D. (2012). The folk epistemology of delusions. Neuroethics, 5(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9125-5
Peralta, V., Cuesta, M. J., (1999ª). Diagnostic signi cance of schneider's rst-rank symptoms in schizophrenia. Comparative study between schizophrenic and non- schizophrenic psychotic disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry J. Ment. Sci. 174, 243–248.
Radden, J. (2010). On delusion. Routledge.
Sanchez-Curry, D. S. (2020). Interpretivism and norms. Philosophical studies, 177(4), 905-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1212-6
Sass, L. A. (1994). The paradoxes of delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber and the schizophrenic mind. Cornell University Press.
Schneider, K. (1959). Clinical Psychopathology. Grune & Stratton.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief. Noûs, 36(2), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00370
Schwitzgebel, E. (2012). Mad belief? Neuroethics, 5(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011- 9127-3
Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). A dispositional approach to attitudes: Thinking outside of the belief box. In N. Nottelman (Ed.), New essays on belief (pp. 75-99). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026521_5
Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Pragmatic Metaphysics of Belief. In C. Borgoni, D. Kindermann, & A. Onofri (Eds.), The Fragmented Mind. Oxford University Press.
Slors, M. (2015). Interpretivism and the Meaning of Mental State Ascriptions. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 10(2), 18-27.
Stephens, G. L. & Graham, G. (2000). When Self-Consciousness Breaks. MIT Press.
Stephens, G. L., & Graham, G. (2006). The delusional stance. In M. C. Chung, K. W. M. Fulford, & G. Graham (Eds.), Reconceiving schizophrenia (pp. 193-216). OUP
Tumulty, M. (2011). Delusions and dispositionalism about belief. Mind & language, 26(5), 596- 628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01432.x
Tumulty, M. (2012). Delusions and not-quite-beliefs. Neuroethics, 5(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9126-4
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, 185, 1124–31.
Young, A. W. (1999). Delusions. The Monist, 82(4), 571–589. http://www.jstor.org/sta- ble/27903656
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2022 Pablo López Silva, Miguel Nuñez de Prado Gordillo, Víctor Fernández Castro