Identity and rights: the limits in the demand and legislation of the Law on the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy
Dossier Resistances
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Aborto; Salud; Género; Interseccionalidad; Justicia reproductiva Abortion; Health; Gender; Intersectionality; Reproductive justice

How to Cite

Wisky, L., & Pagani, C. (2021). Identity and rights: the limits in the demand and legislation of the Law on the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy. Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2(3), e21047. https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v2i3.47

Abstract

In December 2020, in the midst of the health emergency resulting from COVID-19, Law No. 27,610, which guarantees the right to decide and access to voluntary termination of pregnancy up to the fourteenth week (inclusive) of the gestational process, was enacted in Argentina. From a position in favor of the legalization of abortion, this article aims to point out the enunciative and argumentative limits present in the demand and in the letter of the Law. To this end, we use the methodology of a theoretical article, taking as a fundamental antecedent the work of Blas Radi, placing this article in the paradigm of Reproductive Justice. This framework, together with other theoretical contributions, allows us to analyze the theoretical and practical limits of the right to abortion as expressed in the slogans and arguments put forward during the debate and in the text of the Law. Through this analysis, we suggest that the legalization of abortion per se does not produce the reorganization of the social order necessary to guarantee that all people with the capacity to bear children have access to the formally recognized right. Therefore, we conclude that, despite the recognition of the right to the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy, people with the capacity to bear children under unequal conditions can easily be eclipsed by the sunny formulations of “progress” that in fact only defends and guarantees the freedom and equality of some.

https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v2i3.47
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Bornstein, K. (2015). ¿Quién está en la cima? (¿y por qué estamos abajo?) (¿ y es ese realmente un lugar tan malo para estar?). (Pérez, M. Trad.) Ártemis, (20), 187-192.

Brown, W. (2020). Los derechos como paradojas. (Di Tullio, A., & Smiraglia, R., Trads). Las Torres de Lucca: revista internacional de filosofía política, 9(17), 243-261. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/LTDL/article/view/75159

Brown, W., & Halley, J. (2002). Left Legalism / Left Critique. Duke University Press.

CELS (2020, 25 de noviembre). Sobre la objeción de conciencia en el proyecto de regulación del acceso al aborto. CELS https://cutt.ly/7mUj9eO

Davis, A. (2005). Mujeres, raza y clase. Ediciones Alcal.

Freeman, A. (1978). Legitimizing Racial Discrimination through Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review of Supreme Court Doctrine, Minnesota Law Review. 62, 1049. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/804/

Hall, S. (2003). Introducción: ¿quién necesita identidad? En S. Hall y P. Du Gay. Cuestiones de identidad cultural, (pp.13-39). Amorrortu editores.

Ley 27.610, 15 de enero 2021, Acceso a la Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo. Boletín Oficial de la República Argentina, núm 34.562, pp 3 -7. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/239807/20210115

Lugones, M. (2008). Colonialidad y género. Tabula rasa, (9), 73-102. https://revistas.unicolmayor.edu.co/index.php/tabularasa/article/view/1501

Pérez, M., & Radi, B. (2018). El concepto de ‘violencia de género’ como espejismo hermenéutico. Igualdad, autonomía personal y derechos sociales, 8, 69-88. https://www.aacademica.org/moira.perez/49.pdf

Pérez, M. (2021). Interseccionalidad y estrategias feministas de reivindicación de derechos: un ejercicio de equilibrio reflexivo. En M. Herrera, S. Fernández, y N. de la Torre. (dirs.), Tratado de Géneros, Derechos y Justicia. Vol. V: Políticas Públicas y Multidisciplina. Editorial Rubinzal Culzoni.

Poovey, M. (2013). The abortion question and the death of man. En J. Butler, & J. Scott (Eds). Feminists theorize the political (pp. 257-274). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723999

Radi, B. (2020) Reproductive injustice, trans rights, and eugenics. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 396-407, https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318

Radi, B. (2019). Políticas del conocimiento: hacia una epistemología trans. En M. López (Ed). Los mil pequeños sexos. intervenciones críticas sobre políticas de género y sexualidades (pp. 27-42). Eduntref.

Radi, B. (2017). No es un cuerpo equivocado (Entrevista). Soberanía sanitaria, 1(3) 78-83.

Ross, L. J., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive Justice: an introduction. University of California Press.

Young, I. M. (1996). Vida política y diferencia de grupo: una crítica del ideal de ciudadanía universal. En C. Castells (Ed). Perspectivas feministas en teoría política (pp. 99-126). Paidós Ibérica.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Luciana Wisky

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...