The constitutional principle of celerity and its non-compliance in the administration of justice in the province of Cañar in the year 2022
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Direito constitucional; administração da justiça; procedimento legal; celeridade processual. Constitutional law; administration of justice; legal procedure; procedural expeditiousness. Derecho constitucional; administración de justicia; procedimiento legal; celeridad procesal.

How to Cite

Cabrera Calle, K. A., & Zamora Vázquez, A. F. (2024). The constitutional principle of celerity and its non-compliance in the administration of justice in the province of Cañar in the year 2022. Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 5(10), e240150. https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v5i10.150

Abstract

This essay analyzes the principle of constitutional promptness and its noncompliance in the administration of justice in the province of Cañar in 2022. The processing times of protective actions are thoroughly examined to evaluate how variability and delays affect the efficacy of the judicial system. The data shows that, although the majority of cases are resolved within an acceptable range, significant delays exist that impact the effectiveness of justice. The information provided by the Provincial Directorate of the Judiciary of Cañar forms the basis of the research, which is analyzed using statistics such as mode, mean, and median resolution times at different stages of the process. Finally, measures are proposed to improve the promptness of the administration of justice, such as establishing maximum legal deadlines, optimizing procedures, and enhancing the training and resources of judicial personnel.

https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v5i10.150
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2009). Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial.

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional.

Naciones Unidas Derechos Humanos. (1966, 16 de diciembre). Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. https://lc.cx/gCXwxx

Sentencia N. 001-10-PJO-CC, CASO N. 0999-09-JP (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 22 de diciembre de 2010).

Sentencia No. 16-20-CN/21, Caso No. 16-20-CN (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 24 de febrero de 2021). https://lc.cx/H8Mx4H

Sentencia No. 169-14-SEP-CC, CASO N.° 0400-12-EP (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 15 de octubre de 2014).

Sentencia No. 344-16-EP/21, CASO No. 344-16-EP (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 23 de junio de 2021). https://lc.cx/fETubP

Sentencia No. 344-16-EP/21, No. 344-16-EP/21 (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 23 de 06 de 2021).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Karol Andrea Cabrera Calle, Ana Fabiola Zamora Vázquez

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...