Feminist imaginings in the face of automation and the “end of work”: De-automating reproduction and reorganizing kinship
Presentation of the Dossier: Feminisms and posthumanism

Supplementary Files



Sexual division of work; Automation; Future studies; Kinship. División sexual del trabajo; Automatización; Estudios futuros; Parentesco. Divisão sexual do trabalho; Automação; Estudos futuros; Parentesco.

How to Cite

Massacese, M. J. (2023). Feminist imaginings in the face of automation and the “end of work”: De-automating reproduction and reorganizing kinship. Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 4(7), e230110. https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v4i7.110


Automation is once again raising concerns about the threat it poses to employment. Feminists in the 20th century believed that technology could liberate women from undesirable labor. However, historically, industry and automation have not reduced women’s workloads but have instead favored unpaid work, flexibility, and work overload. Rather than mitigating the care and ecological crises, technological development has exacerbated them. This raises an important question for feminist theory: should technology be rejected as a way of reducing women’s workload? To explore this, we analyze classical and contemporary contributions from feminist theorists on the future of work and technology. Using philosophical and feminist theoretical methods, our aim is to examine the relationships between these imaginings and home, family, design, and consumption. This article argues that a feminist analysis of work must include the technological dimension, considering the production of human beings as a strategic technology for feminist purposes. To imagine an alternative near future, the article draws on Donna Haraway’s making kin, emphasizing defamiliarization and refamiliarization of social and ecological relations, pluralist science, and technology for sustainable regeneration of life; and finally, as suggested in this analysis, the ironic persistence of labour in a post-industrial or post-capitalist era.



Bastani, A. (2019). Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. Verso.

Cowan, R. S. (2008). More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books.

Davis, A. (2001) Women, Race & Class. Women’s Press. (Original work published 1981)

Federici, S. (2018). Marxismo y feminismo. Historia y conceptos. In El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo (M. A. Catalán Altuna, Trans.). Tinta Limón.

Federici, S. (2021). Patriarchy of the Wage: Notes on Marx, Gender, and Feminism. PM Press.

Firestone, S. (1979). The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. Bantam Books. (Original work published 1970)

Franklin, S. (1988) The Dialectic of Sex. Shulamith Firestone revisited. Sybil.

Franklin, S. (2017). Staying with the Manifesto: an interview with Donna Haraway. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(4), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417693290

Franklin, S. (2022). Reading Donna Haraway. ReproSoc. http://www.reprosoc.com/blog/2016/12/2/reading-donna-haraway

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2015). Technology at work: the future of innovation and employment. Global Perspectives & Solutions.

Gane, N. (2006). When we have never been human, what is to be done?: Interview with Donna Haraway. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), 135-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069228

Gorz, A. (1983). Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism. South End.

Graziano, V., & Kim T. (2021). On domestic fantasies and anti-Work politics: a feminist history of complicating automation. Theory & Event 24(4), 1130-49. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2021.0062

Haraway, D. J. (2022). Cristales, tejidos y campos. Metáforas que conforman embriones. Rara Avis. (Original work published 1976)

Haraway, D. J. (2006). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge. (Original work published 1989)

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.

Hayden, D. (2000). The Grand Domestic Revolution: History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities. MIT Press.

Hester, H. (2017). Technology becomes her. New Vistas, 3(1), 46-50.

Hester, H. (2018). Care under Capitalism: The Crisis of “Women’s Work”. IPPR Progressive Review, 24(4), 343-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12074

Hester, H., & Srnicek, N. (2018). After Work: The Fight for Free Time. Verso.

Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Penguin books. (Original work published 1857)

Paasonen, S. (2010). From Cybernation to feminization: Firestone and cyberfeminism. In M. Merck & S. Sandford (Eds.), Further Adventures of the Dialectic of Sex (pp. 61-83). Palgrave Macmillan US.

Russ, J. (1986). The Female Man. Beacon paperback 721. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1975)

Srnicek, N., & Williams A. (2016). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World without Work. Verso.

Tsing, A. (2015). Feral Biologies [Presentation]. Engagements: the anniversary of anthropology in Copenhagen. University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/feral-biologies(f88541c5-be02-414e-984d-358e743ebb0d).html.

Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: is it really different this time?: Review essay: automation. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 119-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12239

Weeks, K. (2011). The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Duke University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 María Julieta Massacese


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...